Jonathan Auerbach serves as Of Counsel at Radulescu LLP. His practice focuses on patent litigation in federal district courts, the International Trade Commission, and before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board. He has participated in all aspects of litigation, including pre-suit investigations, handling offensive and defensive discovery, expert discovery, and trial. Jonathan has extensive experience in patent litigation for clients in the LED lighting, pharmaceutical, and financial services industries.
Education
The George Washington University Law School
(J.D., 2008, The George Washington Law Review)
Cornell University
(B.S., 2005, Biological Engineering)
Prior Associations
Goodwin Procter LLP
Associate 2008-2016
Admissions
The State Bar of New York
United States Federal Courts:
Southern District of New York
Eastern District of New York
Court of Federal Claims
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Admitted to practice before the United States Patent and Trademark Office
Notable Representations
Seoul Semiconductor Co., Ltd. et al v. Feit Electric Company, Inc.
Counsel for Plaintiff Seoul Semiconductor in a patent infringement action pending in the Central District of California involving twelve patents related to LED structures and packages for use in LED lighting products.
Seoul Viosys Co., Ltd. v. Feit Electric Co., Inc.
Counsel for Plaintiff Seoul Semiconductor in a patent infringement action pending in the Central District of California involving six patents related to LED structures and packages for use in LED lighting products.
Seoul Semiconductor Co., Ltd. et al v. Finelite, Inc.
Counsel for Plaintiff Seoul Semiconductor in a patent infringement action pending in the Northern District of California involving fourteen patents related to LED structures and packages for use in LED lighting products.
Smart Ceiling Fans, Components Thereof, and Associated Systems and Software; Inv. No. 337-TA-1374 (Violation)
Counsel for Complainant WAC Lighting in a patent infringement action against several defendants involving patents relating to smart ceiling fans.
Feit Electric Company, Inc. v. Savant Technologies LLC d/b/a GE Lighting
Counsel for Defendant Savant Technologies in a patent infringement action in the Northern District of Ohio involving a patent related to LED filament bulbs.
Certain LED Landscape Lighting Devices and Components Thereof; Inv. No. 337-TA-1261 (Violation)
Counsel for Complainant WAC Lighting in a patent infringement action against several defendants involving patents relating to LED landscape lighting products. Obtained Consent Orders preventing importation of all relevant accused products.
In re Bendamustine Consolidated Cases
Represented Cephalon in multiple patent infringement cases in the District of Delaware involving its treatment for chronic lymphocytic leukemia and non-Hodgkin lymphoma, TREANDA®; patents found valid and infringed after two-week bench trial.
Seattle Children’s Hospital v. Teva Parenteral Medicines, Inc
Represented Teva in a patent infringement action under the Hatch-Waxman Act in the District of Delaware in response to Teva’s filing of an ANDA seeking approval to market a generic version of Novartis’s drug TOBI®.
Merck KGaA v. ImClone Systems
Represented Merck in an arbitration proceeding against ImClone for indemnification for breach of provisions in a patent license.
Koninklijke Philips N.V. v. Wangs Alliance Corp., d/b/a WAC Lighting
Counsel for defendant WAC Lighting in a patent infringement action filed by Philips (represented by Finnegan Henderson) in the District of Massachusetts involving 10 patents relating to LED technology including patents originating from Color Kinetics Inc.
Philips Lighting v. Wangs Alliance Corp., d/b/a WAC Lighting
Counsel for respondent WAC Lighting in an International Trade Commission Investigation brought by Philips involving five patents relating to LED technology.
IPRs 2018-1482, 1483, 1484, 1485 (Everlight v. Bridgelux)
Counsel for Patent Owner Bridgelux in four (4) Inter Partes Reviews before the U.S. Patent Trial & Appeal Board involving Bridgelux Patent Nos. 6,869,812; 8,567,988; 8,092,051; and 8,256,929.
Super Lighting v. MaxLite
Counsel for defendant MaxLite in a patent infringement action filed by Super Lighting in the Central District of California involving six patents relating to T8 LED tubes.
OSRAM v. LG
Counsel for complainant OSRAM in an International Trade Commission Investigation involving patents relating to LED light conversion and packaging technology; obtained an initial determination of violation against LG.
Schubert v. OSRAM
Counsel for OSRAM in a patent infringement action in the District of Delaware involving patent relating to crystallographic wet chemical etching of III-V semiconductors.
Lambeth Magnetic Structures vs. Western Digital, Seagate, and Toshiba
Counsel for plaintiff Lambeth Magnetic Structures in a patent infringement action in the Western District of Pennsylvania involving patent relating to magnetic materials for use in hard drives.